PeerJ Computer Science

PeerJ Computer Science is a peer-reviewed journal with the belief that it shouldn't cost many thousands to publish Open Access or maintain high scientific integrity.

VIEW LATEST ARTICLES

Aims & Scope

1
PeerJ Computer Science is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal. It considers articles across the whole of Computer Science.
2
PeerJ Computer Science considers Research Articles, Literature Review Articles, and Registered Reports. It does not accept Hypothesis Papers, Commentaries, Opinion Pieces, Case Studies, Case Reports, etc.
3
PeerJ Computer Science evaluates articles based on an objective determination of scientific and methodological soundness, not on subjective determinations of 'impact' or 'readership' for example.
4
PeerJ Computer Science applies the highest standards to everything it does - specifically, the publication places an emphasis on research integrity; high ethical standards; constructive peer-review; exemplary production quality; and leading-edge online functionality.
5
Submissions should be directed to an audience of Computer Scientists. Articles that are primarily concerned with biology or medicine and do not have a clearly articulated applicability to the broader field of computer science should be submitted to PeerJ - the journal of Life and Environmental Sciences. For example, bioinformatics software tools should be submitted to PeerJ, rather than to PeerJ Computer Science.
6
PeerJ Computer Science does not accept pre-submission inquiries.
7
PeerJ Computer Science reserves the right to decline to consider, or publish, any submissions for any reason. This can include those studies that do not have a grounding in established scientific knowledge, or that conflict with PeerJ's core values.

Peer Review Criteria

Articles are peer reviewed against criteria which aim to judge whether or not an article should join the Scientific Literature. These criteria are grouped into 3 broad categories:
1
Basic Reporting
2
Experimental Design
3
Validity of the Findings
The specific guidelines for each of these categories can be found on the Editorial Criteria page.

Role of the Academic Editor

1
All submissions which pass our basic submission checks are peer reviewed and the peer review process is overseen by an Academic Editor on our Editorial Board .
2
Academic Editors are experienced scientists in their field. They act independently from PeerJ and make independent decisions on submissions.
3
Individual Academic Editors take on responsibility for individual submissions. They solicit expert peer reviewers to comment on the article and they make an editorial decision based on their knowledge of the field utilizing the input of those reviewers.
4
We typically expect that all submissions will be reviewed by two external peer reviewers (in addition to the Academic Editor). Academic Editors are not permitted to accept a submission unless it has been reviewed by at least one external reviewer.
5
Academic Editors are required to treat all submissions confidentially; to declare any potential conflicts of interest; and to adhere to the highest prevailing standards of publication ethics.
6
The Academic Editor who made the Acceptance decision is named on all published articles.