WANT A PROFILE LIKE THIS?
Create my FREE Plan Or learn about other options
Mario Malički
PeerJ Author & Reviewer
415 Points

Contributions by role

Author 135
Reviewer 280

Contributions by subject area

Health Policy
Nursing
Psychiatry and Psychology
Science and Medical Education
Science Policy
Ethical Issues
Legal Issues
Radiology and Medical Imaging
Statistics
Computational Science
Data Science
COVID-19

Mario Malički

PeerJ Author & Reviewer

Summary

After finishing School of Medicine at the University of Zagreb, Croatia, I obtained an MA in Literature and Medicine at King’s College, London, UK, and then worked at the University of Split School of Medicine, Croatia where I obtained my PhD in Medical Ethics titled: Integrity of scientific publications in biomedicine. From 2017-2019 I have been a postdoc at AMC and ASUS Amsterdam, Netherlands, and from 2020-2021 at METRICS, Stanford University, USA. From 2022 I have been an Associate Director of Stanford Program on Research Rigor and Reproducibility (SPORR) I am also a Editor-in-Chief of Research Integrity and Peer Review journal (RIPR).

Ethical Issues Evidence Based Medicine Science & Medical Education Science Policy

Past or current institution affiliations

Stanford University

Work details

Research Scholar

Stanford University
Stanford Program on Research Rigor and Reproducibility (SPORR)

Websites

  • Google Scholar

PeerJ Contributions

  • Articles 2
  • Reviewed 6
June 25, 2024
Structured peer review: pilot results from 23 Elsevier journals
Mario Malički, Bahar Mehmani
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17514 PubMed 38948202
January 19, 2016
Association of trait and specific hopes: cross sectional study on students and workers of health professions in Split, Croatia
Mario Malički, Domagoj Marković, Matko Marušić
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1604 PubMed 26819851

Signed reviews submitted for articles published in PeerJ Note that some articles may not have the review itself made public unless authors have made them open as well.

August 22, 2023
The experiences of COVID-19 preprint authors: a survey of researchers about publishing and receiving feedback on their work during the pandemic
Narmin Rzayeva, Susana Oliveira Henriques, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15864 PubMed 37637174
September 15, 2021
The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers
Akira Matsui, Emily Chen, Yunwen Wang, Emilio Ferrara
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11999 PubMed 34616596
March 31, 2016
Impact of paid work on the academic performance of nursing students
Mery Constanza García-Vargas, Mercedes Rizo-Baeza, Ernesto Cortés-Castell
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1838 PubMed 27069788
December 17, 2015
Establishing the role of honest broker: bridging the gap between protecting personal health data and clinical research efficiency
Hyo Joung Choi, Min Joung Lee, Chang-Min Choi, JaeHo Lee, Soo-Yong Shin, Yungman Lyu, Yu Rang Park, Soyoung Yoo
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1506 PubMed 26713253
May 26, 2015
Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?
Bo-Christer Björk
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.981 PubMed 26038735
May 19, 2015
For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases
Mads Svane Liljekvist, Kristoffer Andresen, Hans-Christian Pommergaard, Jacob Rosenberg
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.972 PubMed 26038727