Editor rating: 7 / 10Tjeerd Boonstra –– The paper further enhances our understanding of muscle mechanics and muscular contraction
Editor rating: 7 / 10Jafri Abdullah –– Methodology looks interesting and reproducible
Section Editor rating: 7 / 10Stephen Macknik –– The use of illusory size changes to body parts—as an analgesic method—is amazing and new. The public will take notice.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Antonio Palazón-Bru –– A scientific evidence to use the German version of the analyzed questionnaire.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Joao Rocha –– In this theoretical paper, the authors have calculated the safe occupational distance for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Of importance, they have indcated the use of a more conservative distance (0.96-1.46 m) instead of 0.7 m found in the literature.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– The reviewers and editors all agree that this is high impact.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Paul Tulkens –– I give a nice overview of what is a well known but often unmet medical and societal problem. It may contribute to come closer to improving the situation in the future.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– This study reveals a potential novel mechanistic pathway in ptsd, a major health concern
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– Looks really relevant to all fields of science and STEM.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10Stephen Macknik –– I believe this paper will be widely read
Discussing these articles