PeerJ Sections
PeerJ, the journal, is now divided into separate Sections by field.
Section Editors have oversight of their section to ensure the journal maintains a fair peer review process and the highest standards of scientific practice in their fields.
Within each Section, the Academic Editors regularly identify and highlight the most important new PeerJ publications in their field. Learn more & Meet the Section Editors.
Section Editor rating: 8 / 10
Stephen Macknik –– The reviewers and editors all agree that this is high impact. Section Editor rating: 7 / 10
Michael Wink –– good taxonomic and phylogenetic work on African bats Editor rating: 7 / 10
Bruno Marino –– This report offers clear management strategy for vertical habitat heterogeneity, such as vegetation cover, for the conservation of breeding bird diversity in South Korea. The results of the study offer conservation options for the region given the potential pressures from anthropogenic enchroachment and climate change. Editor rating: 7 / 10
Hauke Smidt –– Appropriate sample storage methods are crucial for the quality of derived data, and thus, this study is relevant for various fields. Editor rating: 8 / 10
Paolo Giordani –– A very good example of an integrated application of both economic and ecological approaches. Discover your field's Section
At the moment sections are unavailable for environmental science and medical subjects. See subject pages instead.