PeerJ, the journal, is now divided into separate Sections by field.
Section Editors have oversight of their section to ensure the journal maintains a fair peer review process and the highest standards of scientific practice in their fields.
Within each Section, the Academic Editors regularly identify and highlight the most important new PeerJ publications in their field. Learn more & Meet the Section Editors.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Kevin Black –– The authors do real science here, following up on an initial finding from a pilot study and reporting the outcome appropriately. That may sound obvious, but in the real world of research these days it is a delightful breath of fresh hair.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Keith Crandall –– Really nice venom study on scorpions using transcriptomic data in a phylogenetic context.
Editor rating: 7 / 10Bo Huang –– This is an interesting work, which may be of value to a wide range of applications.
Section Editor rating: 7 / 10Siouxsie Wiles –– Many pathogens are considered in isolation rather than as part of communities. This review of the interactions of a bacterium and fungus in cystic fibrosis is an important addition to the literature.
Editor rating: 8 / 10Lei Wang –– The use of multi-time LiDAR with a GIS for landslide model calibration is interesting
At the moment sections are unavailable for environmental science and medical subjects. See subject pages instead.