The effect of different exhalation techniques on the electrical activity of deep abdominal muscles


Abstract

Background. Core stability is essential for effective movement and the prevention of low back pain, with the deep abdominal muscles, particularly the transverse abdominis, playing a central role. Their activation is closely linked to breathing. Different exhalation methods influence intra-abdominal pressure and, consequently, core stability. Although many studies have examined the activation of deep abdominal muscles during exercise, the impact of specific breathing strategies on their activity remains understudied. We aimed to determine how various exhalation methods affect the electrical activity of the deep abdominal muscles.

Methods. The study included 20 healthy female subjects aged 20 to 25 years who met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Deep abdominal muscle activation was measured using surface electromyography of the transversus abdominis muscle during different exhalation patterns in the supine position. Measurements were performed in a single visit following a standardised breathing ratio (inhale:exhale = 3:5), and the data obtained were normalised and statistically processed using nonparametric tests.

Results. The results showed statistically significant differences in the electrical activity of the deep abdominal muscles between different exhalation methods (p < 0.05). The highest values were recorded during voluntary activation of the abdominal muscles during exhalation (tightening the waist and pulling the navel in as far as possible), and the lowest during passive and phonatory exhalations. Exhalation with phonation SH was functionally more similar to exhalation through the nose than to exhalation with lip support. Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences, particularly between voluntary and passive and phonatory modes of exhalation, with large effect sizes (|d| ≥ 0.8).

Conclusion. Different methods of exhalation and voluntary activation of the abdominal muscles affect the functioning of the deep abdominal muscles and core stability. Voluntary activation promotes more coordinated functioning of the core and stabilising muscles, contributing to improved body control and controlled movement. New insights into exhalation methods can contribute to the design of rehabilitation and physical exercise programmes. In the future, it would be useful to expand the research to a broader and more diverse sample, including individuals with various musculoskeletal problems, to better evaluate the long-term effects and clinical applicability of the findings.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].