A passive location method based on energy-based fast regression algorithm for multi-node systems


Abstract

To tackle the high computational complexity and poor real-time performance of passive localization in complex electromagnetic environments, this paper proposes a multi-node cooperative localization method using an Energy-based Fast Regression Algorithm (EFRA). Conventional localization methods based on the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) require iterative solutions to nonlinear optimization problems, which are computationally expensive. By theoretically deriving a variable substitution, we transform the nonlinear Friis transmission equation into a linear regression model of node coordinates, converting the localization problem into a linear least-squares problem that can be solved directly without iteration. The theoretical lower bound of localization accuracy under different node geometries is analyzed, revealing the relationship between accuracy, distance, node spacing, and layout. Simulations demonstrate that the proposed algorithm achieves accuracy comparable to Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) while reducing computational complexity to a linear level. This method is especially suitable for high-real-time applications such as electronic warfare and emergency communications.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].