Machine learning in NTN-assisted IoT: systematic insights into agriculture and cross-domain applications


Abstract

Non-terrestrial networks (NTNs) integrating unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), high-altitude platforms (HAPs), and satellites with Internet of Things (IoT) devices are being increasingly applied in smart agriculture. NTN-assisted IoT supports precision farming through crop disease detection, soil and water management, environmental surveillance, and decision support. Machine learning (ML) methods, including supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement, and federated learning, enhance these applications by improving data fusion, resource allocation, prediction, and automation. However, most existing reviews remain domain-specific and overlook agriculture within the broader NTN-assisted IoT ecosystem, which also enables anomaly detection, healthcare, and environmental monitoring. To address this gap, this study conducted a systematic bibliometric and thematic analysis of ML-driven NTN-assisted IoT research. Twelve major clusters were identified, three of which were closely related to agriculture: (i) sustainability and smart farming, (ii) image processing and anomaly detection, and (iii) big data and cloud/fog-enabled applications. Emerging directions from low-frequency keywords include environmental risk management, air quality monitoring, wildfire detection, edge intelligence, digital twins, and explainable AI. These complement agricultural applications while extending the societal impact of NTN-assisted IoT. The paper provides a unified mapping of the field and highlights opportunities for advancing Agriculture 4.0 and 5.0 through cross-sectoral innovation.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].