DCLA-UNet: Dynamic cross-layer compressive attention with large axial separable convolution for multi-modal MRI brain tumor segmentation


Abstract

Accurate brain tumor segmentation holds critical clinical significance for personalized radiotherapy dose planning and prognostic evaluation, yet existing methods present a fundamental trade-off between global contextual modeling capacity and computational efficiency. While U-Net variants partially mitigate limited receptive fields through skip connections, the inherent inductive biases of conventional convolution operations in their encoders lead to suboptimal robustness in segmenting heterogeneous tumor boundaries, particularly in glioma infiltration zones. Although Transformer architectures effectively capture long-range dependencies, their quadratic computational complexity and excessive parameterization hinder clinical deployment. This study proposes DCLA-UNet, a lightweight architecture that achieves a balance between segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency through three key components: 1) The Dynamic Cross-Layer Compressive Attention (DCLA) module enables cross-layer interaction of multi-scale spatial features via hierarchical channel compression and adaptive dynamic down-sampling; 2) The Slim Large Kernel Module (SLKM) in the encoder integrates large-kernel depthwise convolution with axial depthwise convolution, expanding receptive fields while reducing computational cost; 3) The Multi-Scale Fusion Module (MSFM) in the decoder employs parallel multi-branch feature reconstruction pathways for multi-scale feature integration. The proposed architecture contains only 0.527M trainable parameters (94.96% reduction vs. 3D U-Net) and requires 39.232 GFLOPs (89.7% reduction). On the BraTS2021 benchmark, our method achieves 0.88 mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (+2.09% vs. 3D U-Net) and 6.359 average HD95 (+8.9%improvement), outperforming lightweight segmentation networks including MogaNet and SegFormer3D. The source code is available at https://github.com/Helium-327/DCLA-UNet-3D.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].