Integrating insects in circular food systems: evidence, gaps and research priorities


Abstract

Background. Many of today’s food production systems follow a linear model, where natural resources are extracted, converted into food and discarded as waste. Efforts to reduce the environmental impact of this model have primarily focused on improving nutrient conversion efficiency. However, because linear systems are open-ended, scaling up production typically results in increased environmental costs, making sustainability goals increasingly difficult to achieve. By contrast, circular food systems (CFS) aim to recycle internal waste streams, using intermediary organisms to transform organic waste into resources that can be reused within the system. Insects are particularly promising in this context due to their dual ecological role: they convert plant and other waste into edible biomass and produce frass - a residual waste product with fertilisation potential for supporting plant growth.
Methodology. To assess the current state of knowledge, a structured literature review with a systematic search of peer-reviewed studies was conducted. The Web of Science Core Collection using two topic queries (“circular food system AND insect” and “circular food production system AND insect”) and included all peer-reviewed articles published through December 2024. This resulted in 395 articles identified, of which 63 met the inclusion criteria focusing on insect integration within circular food systems.
Results. Although insects are being actively studied in linear systems for their efficient biomass conversion and nutrient-rich outputs, their central role in circular food systems has so far been explored mostly through theoretical and modelling studies, with limited empirical validation. Unlocking their full potential in circular food systems requires a deeper understanding of how insects process waste, generate harvestable nutrients, and interact with other organisms in closed-loop conditions. Three urgent research priorities were identified: understanding the suitability of residual waste streams as insect feed, elucidating insect ecology and life-cycle dynamics under circular conditions and exploring multi-species interactions within integrated systems.
Conclusions. Because circular systems must function as simplified ecosystems with producers, decomposers, and consumers interacting across trophic levels, an ecosystem engineering approach will be needed to design and maintain them. This transition demands transdisciplinary collaboration and new ecological insights. Addressing these gaps is essential for realising the full ecological and functional potential of insects in sustainable circular food production.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].