Visual acuity and stereopsis across the parafoveal and perifoveal retina in young adult: an eccentricity and meridian analysis


Abstract

Background. Visual acuity (VA) and stereoacuity (SVA) are fundamental visual functions that decline with increasing retinal eccentricity. Patients with macular degeneration and other central vision disorders often rely on paracentral vision, yet location-specific reference data for VA and SVA across the parafoveal and perifoveal retina remain limited. This study aimed to quantify the distribution of binocular VA and SVA across eccentricity and meridian in young adults, develop prediction equations with 95% prediction intervals, and examine the relationship between these two visual functions in the paracentral retina.
Methods. Thirty-five healthy young adults (13 males, 22 females; mean age 27.23 ± 2.43 years) were recruited. Binocular VA and SVA were measured at 48 test positions across eight meridians (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, 315°) and six eccentricities (2.5° to 15° in 2.5° increments) using a polarized 3D display system. A four-alternative forced-choice task was employed with tumbling E optotypes for VA and random-dot stereograms for SVA. Eye tracking ensured fixation stability throughout testing. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the effects of eccentricity and meridian. Linear mixed-effects models and Bayesian Tobit models were employed to develop prediction equations. Ten-fold cross-validation assessed model generalizability.
Results. Both VA and SVA significantly declined with increasing eccentricity (P<0.001). VA decreased from a median of 0.40 logMAR at 2.5° to 1.20 logMAR at 15.0°, at a rate of 0.057 logMAR per degree. SVA increased from 2.1 log arcsec at 2.5° to 2.9 log arcsec at 7.5°, declining approximately three times faster than VA (0.154 log arcsec per degree). Both functions showed significant meridional anisotropy (P<0.001), with the horizontal meridian demonstrating 0.058 logMAR better VA and 0.106 log arcsec better SVA compared to the vertical meridian. Despite parallel declines with eccentricity, no significant correlations were observed between VA and SVA at any test position within 7.5° eccentricity (P>0.05).
Conclusions. VA and SVA deteriorate with increasing eccentricity in the paracentral retina, with stereopsis declining approximately three times faster and demonstrating a more pronounced horizontal-over-vertical advantage. The absence of correlation between VA and SVA suggests distinct neural mechanisms underlying these functions. The prediction equations with 95% prediction intervals provide reference benchmarks for healthy young adults, facilitating clinical interpretation of patient measurements and enabling objective assessment of disease-related changes in paracentral visual function.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].