PE gel: Accelerates acne tissue regeneration via a synergistic antibacterial- resist inflammation - repair axis


Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris is a prevalent inflammatory skin disorder characterized by a pathological triad of follicular hyperkeratosis, Cutibacterium acnes proliferation, and aberrant inflammation, often leading to tissue damage and scarring. The current treatment methods mainly rely on antibiotics, which have drawbacks such as bacterial resistance and insufficient promotion of tissue regeneration. There is an urgent need for a strategy that simultaneously targets bacterial elimination and active tissue repair.

Methods: We developed an alginate-based hydrogel co-loaded with Phellodendron bark Extract (PBE) and Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Exosomes (HucMSC-Exo), call ed PE gel. The antibacterial activity of PBE against C. acnes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli was evaluated through broth microdilution, plate counting, biofilm formation, and live/dead staining assays. The hydrogel's physicochemical properties, drug release profile, and in vitro antibacterial durability were characterized. A rat ear acne model induced by C. acnes was established to assess the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of PE gel by measuring swelling resolution, bacterial load, histopathological changes (H&E and Masson's trichrome staining), and expression of inflammatory and regenerative markers (TNF-α, IL-6, CD31, VEGF via immunohistochemistry).

Results: PBE demonstrated potent, broad-spectrum antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of ~5 mg/mL against C. acnes. Its efficacy was unaffected by the presence of HucMSC-Exo. The PE gel facilitated sustained release of PBE and exhibited enhanced and prolonged antibacterial effects in vitro , which can maintain good antibacterial effect within 72 hours rather than the original 5 hours . In the animal model, PE gel treatment resulted in superior acne resolution compared to gels containing PBE or Exo alone. It significantly reduced ear swelling, decreased tissue bacterial load by over 99.8%, mitigated inflammatory infiltration, diminished follicular hyperkeratosis, and promoted organized collagen remodeling. P athology studies shows that the PE gel has a synergistic effect: PBE primarily mediated antibacterial and anti-inflammatory actions (suppressing TNF-α/IL-6), while HucMSC-Exo primarily drove pro-regenerative processes (enhancing VEGF/CD31-mediated angiogenesis and collagen remodeling).

Conclusion: The PE gel, through a synergistic "antibacterial-resist inflammation-repair" axis, effectively disrupts the vicious cycle of acne pathogenesis. This strategy combines sustained antimicrobial activity with potent anti-inflammatory and regenerative signals, offering a promising and comprehensive non-antibiotic therapeutic platform for a more comprehensive management of acne vulgaris.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].