New species of Pristimantis (Anura: Craugastoridae) from Serra do Pardo National Park, eastern amazon, Brazil


Abstract

Background.The genus Pristimantis is among the most diverse vertebrate groups, with more than 620 recognized species; however, its diversity remains underestimated, particularly in the Brazilian Amazon. The Terra do Meio region, in the eastern Amazon, exhibits substantial taxonomic and distributional gaps, hindering advances in the understanding of the regional herpetofauna. During expeditions to Serra do Pardo National Park, a distinct lineage belonging to the Pristimantis conspicillatus group was identified, motivating its formal description.

Methods. Two specimens were collected in Serra do Pardo National Park, and 368 individuals from Brazilian zoological collections were examined. Morphological characters were assessed following specialized literature, and morphometric measurements were taken using a digital caliper. Genomic DNA was extracted using the 2% CTAB protocol; the 16S rRNA and COI regions were amplified and sequenced using the Sanger method. Sequences were aligned with ClustalW, filtered with GBLOCKS, and analyzed in MrBayes under the HKY+G model for phylogenetic inference. Genetic distances (16S rRNA and COI) were calculated in MEGA. The nomenclatural act was registered in ZooBank.


Results. Phylogenetic analyses recovered a distinct lineage, here recognized as Pristimantis pardoensis sp. nov., sister to the clade comprised by P. latro, P. pictus, P. giorgii, and P. moa. Genetic distances ranged from 9.1–9.9% (16S rRNA) and 19.5–22% (COI) in relation to the most closely related species. The new species exhibits a unique combination of morphological characters, including diagnostic ventral skin texture, presence of dorsal tubercles, finger fringes, basal webbing on the feet, and a throat with a strongly mottled coloration pattern.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].