The impact of Post-COVID-19 Brain Fog Symptoms among older adults: A cross-sectional online study


Abstract

Background. Data remain limited regarding the persistence of post-COVID-19 "brain fog". We aimed to assess the impact of post-COVID-19 brain fog symptoms in Chinese older adults using a cross-sectional study.
Methods. Based on Cognitive Dysfunction Self-Rating Scales and considering the common symptoms of post-COVID-19 brain fog, we assessed participants using a self-report brain fog symptom scale across multiple dimensions, including attention, comprehension, memory, emotion, motivation, and sleep . A total of 1698 older adults over 50 years of age completed the questionnaire. We compared differences in brain fog symptoms between different participants and performed a multivariable linear regression to identify factors that might be associated with brain fog symptoms .
Results. The results showed that older adults infected with COVID-19 had significantly higher self-reported brain fog scores than uninfected participants ( p = 0.005) . Among the infected participants, females had significantly higher scores on the self-report brain fog scale than males ( p = 0.007). Specifically, the self-reported brain fog scores of the participants infected for 1-6 months were significantly higher than those of the uninfected participants ( p = 0.003). Participants infected for more than 6 months did not have significantly different self-reported brain fog scores from uninfected participants ( p = 0.118). Multivariable linear regression showed that female sex and rural residence significantly increased brain fog risk.
Conclusions. Older adults manifested more pronounced brain fog symptoms following COVID-19, with gradual resolution observed by 6 months post-infection . Therefore, appropriate interventions should be considered for post-COVID-19 older adults to maintain cognitive health .
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].