From mechanism to therapeutics: targeting the MAPK1/ERK2 pathway in renal fibrosis


Abstract

Renal fibrosis represents a pivotal pathological event in the progression of chronic kidney disease to end-stage renal disease, with limited therapeutic options currently available. As a key regulator of cell proliferation and differentiation, the mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MAPK1)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) signaling pathway plays a central role in the development of renal fibrosis. This review aims to systematically elucidate the regulatory network of the MAPK1/ERK2 pathway, integrate recent advances in targeted anti-renal fibrosis therapies, and provide directions for developing novel anti-renal fibrosis drugs. The focus centers on identified bioactive compounds, encompassing both chemically synthesized drugs and natural bioactive compounds. Through systematic literature searches in databases such as PubMed and Web of Science, this review elucidates how the pathway responds to upstream signals and promotes myofibroblast activation, inflammatory responses, and abnormal extracellular matrix deposition via downstream effector molecules. The review highlights that these specific compounds and drugs demonstrate significant antifibrotic efficacy in preclinical models, primarily achieved through direct or indirect inhibition of MAPK1/ERK2 phosphorylation. We highlight that these chemically defined monomeric compounds and drugs represent ideal molecular probes and therapeutic leads. In conclusion, targeting the MAPK1/ERK2 pathway remains strategically important. Given the current absence of approved anti-fibrotic drugs, in-depth exploration of precise molecular targets within this pathway holds significant clinical translational potential and may fill a critical gap in this field.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].