Efflux Transporters BCRP and MRP2 Deficiency Disrupt Bile Acid Homeostasis and Induce Liver Injury


Abstract

Background: Bile acid (BA) homeostasis is critical for hepatic integrity, with ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters Mrp2 (Abcc2) and Bcrp (Abcg2) playing key roles in BA transport. Mrp2 functions as the primary canalicular exporter of conjugated BAs, while Bcrp exerts auxiliary effects; however, their age-specific functional differences, crosstalk, and contributions to cholestatic liver injury remain incompletely elucidated. This study aimed to address these knowledge gaps using genetic knockout models.
Methods: Four mouse genotypes (wild-type [WT], Mrp2 ⁻/⁻ , Bcrp ⁻/⁻ , and Mrp2 ⁻/⁻ -Bcrp ⁻/⁻ ) were analyzed across three age cohorts (10, 20, and 40 weeks). Organ weights and indices were calculated; BA profiles in liver, bile, plasma and feces, and the expression of BA synthetic/metabolic enzymes (Cyp7a1, Cyp27a1, Cyp8b1, Baat, Bacs) was quantified using UHPLC-MS/MS method; and liver histopathology was evaluated via hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining.
Results: Mrp2 ⁻/⁻ mice exhibited significantly increased liver weight and liver index across all ages, accompanied by marked hepatic accumulation of conjugated BAs (e.g., 13.4-fold elevation of taurochenodeoxycholic acid [T-CDCA] at 20 weeks) and upregulated expression of Cyp27a1, Cyp8b1, Baat, and Bacs (1.4–1.9-fold vs. WT). They also developed progressive liver injury, including macrovesicular steatosis and focal inflammatory infiltration, which worsened at 40 weeks. In contrast, Bcrp ⁻/⁻ mice showed only transient liver weight increase at 10 weeks and minimal alterations in BA profiles or enzyme expression. Notably, Mrp2 ⁻/⁻ -Bcrp ⁻/⁻ mice displayed milder hepatic pathology than Mrp2 ⁻/⁻ mice. BA dysregulation was age-dependent, with peak perturbations at 10 weeks and partial compensation (e.g., via upregulated basolateral transporters) in later cohorts.
Conclusions: We constructed double gene knockout mice and established a UHPLC-MS/MS method for detecting the expression of enzymes related to BA synthesis and metabolism in mice. The results indicate that Mrp2 is indispensable for canalicular export of conjugated BAs and maintenance of gut-liver axis homeostasis, as its deficiency drives toxic BA accumulation and progressive liver injury. Bcrp plays a secondary, age-restricted role in BA transport and may exert protective effects in Mrp2-deficient contexts. These findings highlight Mrp2 as a potential therapeutic target for cholestatic liver diseases such as primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].