Color morphs of Halichondria panicea reflect microbial community shifts and coastal environmental stress


Abstract

Background. Color polymorphism is common in marine sponges, but the mechanisms driving color variation remain unclear. This study investigated environmental and microbial drivers of color polymorphism in the marine sponge Halichondria panicea, which exhibits green and yellow morphs.

Methods. A total of 105 sponge samples (42 green and 63 yellow) were collected from three locations with varying bathing water quality and over four seasons. Analyses included microbiome profiling (16S and 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) variable V3/V4 region amplicon sequencing), pigment quantification, PICRUSt2-based functional prediction, and comprehensive seawater physical and chemical measurements. The study evaluated drivers of color variation, mainly testing the surrounding environmental factors that may contribute to shaping the sponge's photosymbiotic bacterial community.

Results. Green morphs represented stable, photosymbiont-rich communities dominated by Acaryochloris MBIC11017, with significantly higher chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations, elevated cyanobacterial diversity, phototrophic eukaryotes (Phymatolithon), and enhanced metabolic profiles characterized by anaerobic metabolism, specialized metal transport systems, and sulfur cycling pathways. Yellow morphs represented stress-adapted, heterotroph-dominated states with Synechococcus CC9902 dominance, reduced pigment content, lower cyanobacterial diversity, increased parasitic dinoflagellate abundance (Syndiniales), and simplified metabolic profiles enriched in oxidative, stress-responsive pathways. Multiple statistical approaches (Random Forest, elastic net) all identified conductivity, nutrients (ammonium, nitrite), pH, and heavy metals as primary drivers. Green morphs were found in moderate metal environments with alkaline pH and lower ionic stress. Yellow morphs dominated high conductivity, elevated total dissolved solids, and nutrient-enriched conditions. Sponge color distribution was independent of bathing water quality classifications and season, but varied significantly by location.

Conclusions. Color polymorphism reflects distinct holobiont states shaped by the surrounding environmental conditions. Green morphs represent stable communities with complex photosymbiotic bacteria, while yellow morphs represent stress-adapted communities with simplified metabolic profiles. Both morphs are functional, but the yellow morphs may be less resilient to additional stressors. Therefore, sponge color serves as a bioindicator of environmental stress conditions and holobiont state, providing insights into sponge responses to environmental change.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].