Poem meter classification of spoken Arabic poetry: Integrating high-resource systems for a low-resource task


Abstract

Arabic poetry constitutes an essential and integral component of the Arabic language and cultural heritage. Historically, Arabs have used poetry to document significant events, including battles and conflicts, as well as to express romance, pride, lamentation, and various other sentiments. Over the decades, Arabic poetry has attracted substantial scholarly attention from linguists. A distinguishing feature of Arabic poetry is its distinctive rhythmic structure, known as meter, which differentiates it from prose. These meters, along with other poetic characteristics, are extensively studied in the Arabic linguistic field of "Aroud." Identifying the meter of a verse is a complex and time-consuming process requiring specialized knowledge in Aroud. For spoken poetry, this process becomes even more challenging due to the additional layer of audio processing. In this study, we propose a state-of-the-art framework to identify poem meters in recited Arabic poetry by integrating two separate high-resource systems to perform this low-resource task. To facilitate future research and ensure generalization of our proposed architecture, we publish a benchmark dataset specifically designed for this task.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].