Agent-based model for simulating microbial movement with preferred target for agricultural biologicals


Abstract

Agricultural biologicals represent a rapidly growing field providing potential solutions to food security and sustainable agriculture. Microbial products are one of the key components of agricultural biologicals, where beneficial microbes enhance crop production and resistance through plant-microbe interactions. However, the effectiveness depends on beneficial microorganisms successfully navigating through complex soil environments to reach plant targets such as roots and rhizosphere. Microbial movement poses significant challenges to monitor and study in real-world environments.
This study developed a flexible Agent-Based Model (ABM) that simulates the dynamics of microbial communities via a large number of microbial agents, each with their own attributes, including age, location, and functional class. The model incorporates interactions between inoculated microbes, native background microbial communities, and environmental factors. The microbial dynamics are governed by two mechanisms: population dynamics and directional movement preferences. The model simulated population dynamics via birth-death processes. Directional preference was driven by two factors: resource attraction describes chemotactic responses to plant signals such as plant root exudates, modeled via attraction strength parameter, and density-dependent repulsion force from neighboring microbes, modeled with repulsion intensity parameter.
The model was validated through systematic parameter analysis and laboratory experiments confirming that growth patterns matched simulated results. Comprehensive simulations replicating real world agricultural scenarios demonstrated that the model successfully reproduced theoretical population growth patterns and captured realistic chemotactic responses. Results showed that the attraction strength parameter effectively modulates microbial movement preferences toward resources, with small parameter values resulting in tight clustering. Large repulsion intensity values show realistic avoidance behaviors between microbes. Laboratory validation using fungal strains confirmed preferential growth toward nutrient sources, with optimal attraction strength value between 2.5 and 3.5 to accurately reproduce observed experimental growth patterns across multiple timepoints.
This ABM provides a flexible computational framework for understanding microbial behavior in agricultural systems and offers a computationally tractable approach for large scale population studies. The framework can incorporate additional mechanisms for studying microbial behaviors and environmental interactions, allowing researchers to tailor it for different research applications. The ABM enables predicting microbial behaviors in complex soil environments and contributes to the development of more effective agricultural biologicals for sustainable farming practices. The model is available at: https://github.com/ComputationalAgronomy/simulation_bacteria.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].