Back to all available

Are you into music or sports? Exploring the associations of music and sport identity with mental and physical health through underlying psychological and behavioral mechanisms

psychiatry-and-psychology
mental-health

Abstract

Leisure activities are essential for building and maintaining a sense of identity, which can significantly impact mental and physical health. Previous research has largely focused on the frequency of engagement in these activities, overlooking the role of identity. Therefore, this cross-sectional online survey examined how music and sports identities relate to health outcomes. To gain more insights into potential internal (psychological) and external (behavioral) mechanisms underlying these associations, we further explored self-efficacy and health behavior as mediators. A total of 242 participants who regularly engage in leisure sports or music activities completed an online survey assessing their identification as (hobby) musicians and sportspersons, mental and physical health, self-efficacy, and health behavior. Using path modeling, we found that a strong sports identity is associated with better mental health, while no direct effects were observed for physical health. Music identity did not directly relate to mental or physical health. However, mediation analyses revealed that both sport and music identities are linked to improved mental health through increased self-efficacy and to better physical health through enhanced health behaviors. These findings suggest that leisure identities play an indirect but crucial role in health, mediated by self-efficacy and health behavior. This knowledge can inform the development of leisure interventions aimed at promoting physical and mental health by raising awareness of the role of leisure identities and addressing self-efficacy beliefs and health behaviors.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].