BTSANet: Integrating structural prior and temporal dynamics with Mamba for accurate cerebrovascular segmentation in DSA sequences


Abstract

Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) is widely regarded as the clinical gold standard for cerebrovascular disease diagnosis, but cerebrovascular segmentation in DSA sequences remains challenging due to complex vascular morphology and strong spatiotemporal dependencies. Existing methods, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Transformers, struggle with spatiotemporal coupling and computational inefficiency, especially Transformers, which suffer from quadratic complexity (O(N²)) when processing long sequences. To address these issues, we propose BTSANet, a novel spatiotemporal segmentation network based on the Mamba architecture that enables efficient long-range dependency modeling with linear complexity (O(N)). Our network features a dual-branch encoder: one processes raw DSA sequences to capture hemodynamics, while the other takes Minimum Intensity Projection (MinIP) images to extract enhanced vascular structural priors. At the bottleneck, we introduce a Bidirectional Temporal-Spatial Attention (BTSA) module with an asymmetric cross-attention strategy. This module prioritizes spatial structural information, enabling adaptive alignment of temporal dynamics with spatial features to enhance the delineation of vascular boundaries, particularly for fine branches. Extensive experiments on the public DIAS dataset demonstrate that BTSANet outperforms state-of-the-art models based on CNNs, Transformers, and Mamba across multiple metrics, achieving a Dice score of 94.39±1.40% and an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 89.41±2.51%. Systematic ablation studies confirm the synergistic effects between structural priors and temporal dynamics, underscoring the efficacy of each core component. This work offers a robust technical solution for intelligent DSA sequence analysis, with promising clinical translation value.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].