Back to all available

Assessment of radiation safety awareness among nurses in nuclear medicine departments

nursing
radiology-and-medical-imaging

Abstract

Background: Nuclear medicine is a critical specialty involving the use of radioactive materials for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Nurses working in these departments are frequently exposed to ionizing radiation, placing them at occupational risk. Despite the availability of safety guidelines, the extent of nurses’ awareness of and adherence to radiation protection protocols remains uncertain. This study was conducted to assess the level of radiation safety awareness among nurses in nuclear medicine departments across Saudi Arabia.

Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 19 January to 24 March 2025 using a structured, self-administered questionnaire distributed via online platforms. A total of 233 registered nurses participated and met the predefined inclusion criteria. The data were analyzed using SPSS, focusing on descriptive statistics and inferential tests to evaluate awareness, knowledge, and protective practices.

Results: Most nurses demonstrated moderate to good general awareness of radiation safety. However, gaps were identified in specific areas, including knowledge of dose limits, use of personal dosimeters, and formal training. Notably, over half of the participants had not received structured radiation safety education, and adherence to protective practices, such as exposure time, distance, and shielding, was inconsistent. Institutional support was found to be present in many settings; however, protocol enforcement varied widely.

Conclusion: The study reveals a need for enhanced, continuous radiation safety training and stronger institutional enforcement to ensure consistent protective practices among nurses in nuclear medicine. Improving awareness and compliance is essential for both staff safety and quality patient care.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].