Back to all available

Age-dependent changes in the transverse carpal ligament and median nerve: a cadaveric histological and biomechanical study

anatomy-and-physiology
pathology
histology

Abstract

Background
Age-related alterations in the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) and the median nerve are thought to increase susceptibility to carpal tunnel syndrome in older individuals. This study aimed to investigate the mechanical properties of the TCL and histological changes in both the TCL and the median nerve in cadavers across a wide age range.
Methods
Fifty formalin-embalmed cadavers (40-93 years old) were studied, yielding 100 TCL specimens. A digital palpation device (MyotonPRO) was used in situ to measure TCL dynamic stiffness, elasticity (logarithmic decrement), mechanical stress relaxation time, and creep at proximal, middle, and distal regions. After testing, each TCL and corresponding median nerve were excised. Masson’s trichrome staining and scanning electron microscopy were performed to assess collagen fiber organization, fibroblast density, and nerve structure. Pearson’s correlation was used to determine associations between TCL properties and age.
Results
An age-dependent increase in TCL stiffness was observed, alongside decreased elasticity, relaxation time, and creep. Histological analyses revealed reduced fibroblast density, disorganized collagen fibers with large clefts between bundles, and increased fine collagen meshwork in interfascicular matrix in older specimens. Furthermore, thinning of connective tissue layers surrounding the median nerve and diminished myelin sheaths were noted with advancing age.
Conclusion
This cadaveric study reveals that the TCL stiffens and becomes structurally disorganized with advancing age, paralleled by degenerative changes in the median nerve. Such age-related alterations may predispose elderly individuals to a higher risk of carpal tunnel syndrome, underscoring the need for targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].