Overaccumulation of miR-483-3p exerts chronic toxic effects on ovarian granulosa cells by impairing cell proliferation, mitochondrial function, and METTL3-mediated m6A modification


Abstract

Background. Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is a common cause of female infertility. Our previous high-throughput sequencing study demonstrated a specific expression profile of follicular fluid-derived exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) in DOR patients, suggesting that exosomal miRNAs may play a critical role in the pathogenesis and progression of DOR. Using a miRNA PCR array, we identified that miR-483-3p is markedly upregulated in exosomes derived from the follicular fluid of DOR patients. Bioinformatic and experimental analyses revealed that METTL3 is a potential target gene of miR-483-3p. This suggests that excess accumulation of miR-483-3p may have cytotoxic effects and also exert an inhibitory effect on METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine (m6A). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of miR-483-3p on METTL3 expression, m6A modification levels, cell proliferation, and mitochondrial function in ovarian granulosa cells (GCs).

Methods. The targeting interaction between miR-483-3p and METTL3 was confirmed using a dual-luciferase reporter gene assay. RT-qPCR, cellular immunofluorescence, Western blot, and Dot blot were used to evaluate the effects of miR-483-3p mimics, cyclophosphamide (CTX), and STM2457 on METTL3 and m6A expression levels in KGN cells. Additionally, cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) and 5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) assays, along with mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) measurements, were used to examine the impact of these treatments on KGN cell proliferation and mitochondrial function.

Results. miR-483-3p directly targets the 3 ′ untranslated region (3 ′ UTR) of METTL3, and its mimics significantly suppress METTL3 gene expression. In stark contrast, CTX robustly promoted METTL3 gene expression, concomitant with a substantial elevation in global m6A levels. STM2457 treatment also showed a similar trend. The inhibitory effect of miR-483-3p overexpression on METTL3 protein expression and m6A levels was modest, suggesting the presence of complex post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that may buffer protein and m6A changes despite gene expression suppression. Regarding cellular phenotypes, miR-483-3p overexpression, CTX, and STM2457 all exerted significant inhibitory effects on KGN cells. All three treatments consistently suppressed the proliferative activity of KGN cells, reduced the EdU-positive cell ratio, and decreased MMP levels.

Conclusion. This study demonstrated that aberrantly high expression of miR-483-3p significantly suppresses METTL3 mRNA expression but only moderately reduces METTL3 protein and m6A levels, indicating complex post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, overexpression of miR-483-3p markedly inhibited the proliferation of GCs and impaired their mitochondrial function. These findings suggested that overaccumulation of miR-483-3p may contribute to the pathogenesis of DOR.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].