Altitude residency and fitness development: A retrospective longitudinal study of physical fitness in high-altitude native and migrant university students


Abstract

Environmental factors, particularly high-altitude conditions, significantly influence physical fitness. While cross-sectional studies provide valuable insights into the effects of altitude on fitness, there is a notable scarcity of longitudinal research investigating both short-term and long-term impacts of high-altitude environments on physical fitness. This study leverages China's robust national physical fitness monitoring system to assess fitness indicators among three distinct groups: high-altitude natives, high-altitude migrants, and sea-level controls. The sample comprised 2,633 university students aged 18–22 from Lhasa, Tibet (3,650 meters), and a low-altitude region (260 meters), including 949 native students, 807 migrants from low-altitude areas, and 877 low-altitude controls. Fitness evaluations were conducted during the students' first and third years of university, adhering to national standards. Measurements included Body Mass Index (BMI), lung capacity, 50-meter sprint, sit-and-reach, sit-ups or pull-ups, and 800-meter or 1,000-meter runs. The results indicated significant differences in fitness performance among female students across the three groups, particularly in lung capacity, 50-meter sprint, standing long jump, sit-and-reach, 800-meter run, and sit-ups. Males also showed significant differences, except for the standing long jump. Both native and migrant groups experienced declines in most performance measures from freshman to junior year, except for the sit-and-reach test. Notably, changes in the 800-meter run for females and the 1,000-meter run for males varied significantly across the three groups (P < 0.001). Curve regression analysis demonstrated an inverse "J" relationship between Physical Fitness Index (PFI) and BMI across all groups (P < 0.001), with BMI having a lesser impact on female PFI than on males. While PFI values increased for both females and males in the control group by their junior year, the migrant group experienced a decline, and the native group showed minimal changes. In conclusion, group status significantly impacts fitness outcomes, with the control group consistently outperforming native and migrant groups. Additionally, both native and migrant groups experienced declines in average fitness scores from freshman to junior year, contrasting with the performance of the low-altitude controls. The differences in the relationship between PFI and BMI underscore the necessity for tailored fitness assessments in high-altitude environments that account for gender variations.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].