Osteological differences in the humerus of loggerhead and green turtles


Abstract

Limbs are the most locomotory anatomical structures in vertebrate fauna and are optimally adapted to their habitats and ecology. Sea turtles rely almost entirely on their fore flippers for aquatic locomotion. The humerus is the most crucial bone structure connecting the shoulder and front flipper, and studies thereof are used to understand turtles’ locomotion mechanisms and swimming strategies. To define the morphological traits of the humerus of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green (Chelonia mydas) turtles and analyze interspecific differences, sea turtle carcasses were sampled from strandings and bycatch in Korean waters within their northern range limit. The length and width of the carapace, plastron, and 15 parts of the left humerus from the carcasses were measured and analyzed. The humerus length and width were positively linearly correlated with the straight carapace length of both sea turtle species, indicating that the carapace size of sea turtles can be reasonably estimated based on the size of the humerus. Additionally, significant interspecific differences were identified in 12 humeral segments, with loggerhead turtles having a humerus that was longer overall but thinner toward the shoulder than green turtles. These differences may be related to their migration patterns, as loggerhead turtles, which migrate long distances, have elongated humeri that are wider toward the tip, which may reflect their efficient use of ocean currents for swimming instead of relying on flapping. In contrast, the green turtle, which is a more vigorous swimmer, has a short but thick humerus that can withstand the stress on the shoulder caused by flapping. These findings demonstrate that bone structure and function differ among even closely related species, depending on their habitat and the environmental exploitation strategies employed.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].