Emoji-aware multimodal representations for multi-label emotion analysis in Indonesian social media


Abstract

Text Emotion Analysis (TEA) has received growing attention, yet most studies rely solely on textual features and adopt single-label classification, oversimplifying the complexity of human emotions. Research on low-resource languages such as Indonesian remains limited, with few datasets incorporating paralinguistic cues like emojis—despite their strong affective value. To address these gaps, this study proposes an emoji-aware multimodal framework for multi-label emotion classification in Indonesian social media texts. A novel dataset was constructed using a semi-automated annotation pipeline that integrates distant supervision with expert refinement, combining textual and emoji signals. Three fusion strategies—early (concatenation and tokenizer expansion), intermediate (cross-attention), and late (average and weighted)—were implemented and compared against a text-only IndoBERT baseline. Experimental results show that all multimodal fusion strategies consistently outperform the baseline, confirming the value of emojis as paralinguistic features. The Tokenizer Expansion–based Early Fusion achieved the highest F1-Micro (0.8559), while the Cross-Attention–based Intermediate Fusion attained the best F1-Macro (0.7409), indicating strong overall and balanced performance, respectively. This study advances TEA in low-resource languages by (i) introducing a new Indonesian emoji-aware multi-label dataset, (ii) providing comparative insights into multimodal fusion strategies, and (iii) demonstrating the benefits of integrating emojis for affective text understanding.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].