Survival and predictors of neonatal mortality: a hospital based retrospective follow up study from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia


Abstract

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality remains one of the most pressing global health challenges, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. In Ethiopia, complex interrelated factors contribute to high neonatal mortality rates, creating a multifaceted public health concern that demands comprehensive investigation. Despite the magnitude of this challenge, there exists a notable lack of longitudinal studies that examine the temporal patterns of neonatal deaths, survival, and associated risk factors throughout the complete neonatal period. This study addresses this gap by evaluating survival outcomes and identifying determinants of mortality among neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Zewditu Memorial Hospital, a referral facility serving a high-burden urban population in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.


Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 1,014 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from September 11, 2020, to September 10, 2023 was done. Systematic random sampling was used to select patients. Electronic data collection method was used, and the data were exported to STATA version 17.0 for cleaning and analyses. Bi-variable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models identified mortality predictors. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank tests compared survival probabilities. Model adequacy was assessed using the Cox-Snell residual test.


Results: Over 7,945 neonate-days, the mortality incidence rate was 13.72 deaths per 1,000 neonate-days (95% CI: 11.37, 16.55), with most deaths occurring within the first week. Significant predictors of mortality were extremely low birth-weight (<1,000 g; AHR=18.94, 95% CI: 7.89, 45.23), very low birth-weight (1,000–1,499 g; AHR=2.47, 95% CI: 1.28, 4.77), perinatal asphyxia (AHR=3.52, 95% CI: 2.25, 5.49), neonatal sepsis (AHR=2.47, 95% CI: 1.28, 4.77), respiratory distress syndrome (AHR=1.65, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.68), and meconium aspiration syndrome (AHR=2.35, 95% CI: 1.20, 4.57).


Conclusion: This study demonstrates elevated neonatal mortality rates with birth weight and specific perinatal complications as primary determinants of survival. The predominance of deaths within the first week, particularly among neonates with low birth weight, perinatal asphyxia, sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, and meconium aspiration syndrome, necessitates implementation of risk-stratified care and intensive early monitoring. These findings provide evidence for targeted interventions that could substantially reduce neonatal mortality in resource-constrained healthcare settings.

Key words: neonate, mortality, Ethiopia, survival, NICU

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].