Immediate effects of a 15-minute seated yoga posture on plantar pressure in young adults with flexible flat feet: A pilot study


Abstract

Background: Flexible flat feet are associated with altered plantar pressure distribution, discomfort, and reduced postural stability. Evidence on the immediate biomechanical effects of yoga on plantar loading patterns is limited.

Objectives: To investigate the immediate effect of a 15-minute easy-seated yoga posture (sukhasana) on plantar pressure distribution in young adults with flexible flat feet.

Methods: 20 healthy young adults (10 males, 10 females; aged 18–25 years) with flexible flat feet participated in this pre–post study. Plantar pressure parameters (peak, mean, and gradient pressures) were measured during quiet standing using a calibrated pressure mat (4096 sensors; 60–100 Hz) before and immediately after a 15-minute sukhasana session. Differences between pre- and post-intervention measurements were statistical analyzed using paired-sample t-tests (p < 0.05).

Results: In males, peak plantar pressure showed non-significant reductions (left: 165.5 ± 52.3 → 164.5 ± 52.1 kPa; right: 150.0 ± 49.3 → 146.5 ± 56.4 kPa; p > 0.05), while mean pressures increased slightly. In females, left-foot peak pressure significantly decreased (232.0 ± 50.9 → 192.0 ± 51.7 kPa; −17.2%; p < 0.05) and mean pressure decreased by 21.4% (p < 0.05). Gradient pressure significantly increased in the left foot of males (+3.7%; p < 0.05) but decreased in females' left foot (left −25.5%; p < 0.05).

Conclusions: A single 15-minute session of easy-seated yoga acutely redistributes plantar pressures in young adults with flexible flat feet, particularly among females. This posture may serve as a simple, low-cost adjunct to improve plantar load distribution.

Keywords: Yoga; Plantar pressure; Flexible flat feet; Biomechanics; Postural stability; Rehabilitation

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].