Exploring the relationship between gut Microbiota and Asthma Comorbidities


Abstract

Asthma is a prevalent chronic inflammatory airway disease that frequently coexists with comorbidities such as obesity, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). These co-occurring conditions share certain inflammatory pathways with asthma and can complicate disease management. Emerging research suggests that the gut microbiota is a key environmental factor linking these disorders via the gut–lung axis. This narrative review summarizes how gut microbial dysbiosis may influence immune regulation and chronic inflammation underlying asthma and its common comorbidities. For example, an altered gut microbiome composition in obesity can promote systemic low-grade inflammation, contributing to a neutrophilic asthma phenotype, while reduced early-life microbial diversity has been associated with increased risk of allergic diseases and asthma[1]. There is also evidence that gut dysbiosis might play a role in chronic rhinosinusitis and GERD; notably, Helicobacter pylori colonization has been linked to a decreased risk of childhood asthma. Microbiome-targeted interventions (such as probiotics, prebiotics, dietary modulation, and fecal microbiota transplantation) show promise in modulating airway inflammation and improving asthma control in preliminary studies. A better understanding of the gut–lung axis could open novel avenues for the prevention and integrated management of asthma and its comorbidities, providing valuable insights for clinicians, microbiome researchers, and translational scientists working on innovative therapeutic strategies.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].