Computer vision applications in the mining industry: A systematic review


Abstract

Computer vision (CV) is a highly-relevant field within the artificial intelligence that enables machines to interpret and analyse visual data from the physical world, mimicking human vision. In the mining industry, CV applications have become popular as a means to address critical challenges such as optimizing resource extraction, improving safety, and minimizing environmental impact. However, existing research often addresses specific use cases, resulting in a fragmented understanding of CV’s broader applications across the sector. Based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this systematic literature review (SLR) addresses this gap by consolidating diverse research into a broad resource. Peer-reviewed journal articles (2019–2024) from Web of Science and Scopus were reviewed, with 100 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The findings indicate that CV technologies have evolved from isolated tools to interconnected analytical ecosystems spanning the entire mining value chain. Applications range from safety monitoring and ore detection to environmental assessments, enhanced by multi-sensor fusion and deep learning. However, a critical validation gap emerges: while safety rhetoric dominates adoption justifications, fewer than 25% of studies provide quantitative validation. Environmental robustness remains the primary technical barrier, with methodological fragmentation undermining deployment confidence. The field requires a shift toward comprehensive field validation, standardized frameworks, and responsible deployment. This transformation signals the emergence of predictive, environmentally conscious mining practices that will fundamentally reshape resource extraction while advancing CV capabilities for sustainable industrial applications.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].