The Junier blood group system: from discovery to the clinic


Abstract

Background: In 2012, the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) formalized the Junier (JR) blood group (ISBT 032), with Jra (ISBT 032001) as its sole antigen. As of May 2025, the ISBT has recognized 48 blood group systems comprising 371 red blood cell antigens encoded by 53 genes. Jra is located on a multipass membrane glycoprotein, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2), also known as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) or CD338, which is involved in various physiological, biochemical, and metabolic processes in the human body. The glycoprotein is encoded by the ABCG2 gene, located on chromosome 4.

In recent years, polymorphisms in the ABCG2 gene have been increasingly elucidated through deeper investigation of the JR blood group system. Concurrently, the JR blood group system has gained clinical importance due to its association with fetal and neonatal anemia, hydrops fetalis, neonatal jaundice, hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), hyperuricemia/gout, mirror syndrome, and hemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR).

In addition, the JR blood group system plays a regulatory role in several physiological and pathological processes, including uric acid metabolism, folate and porphyrin homeostasis, substance exchange across the blood-brain barrier, and the transport and resistance of anti-tumor drugs.

This study reviews the distributional characteristics, molecular biological features, immunological features, and clinical significance of the JR blood group system.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].