Design of an intelligent optimization framework for corporate financial management based on GA-FL-Transformer


Abstract

This paper addresses the challenges in enterprise financial management, such as difficulties in processing multi-source heterogeneous data, poor adaptability to dynamic environments, and a lack of systematic integration in the decision-making process. To tackle these issues, a new intelligent optimization framework, named g enetic a lgorithm -f uzzy l ogic - Transformer ( GA-FL-Transformer ) , is proposed. First , the framework employs the Transformer architecture to achieve unified encoding and feature fusion of multi-source financial data, extracting multi-dimensional features with high discriminative power. Subsequently, an attention-weight-guided co-evolutionary mechanism integrating g enetic a lgorithm (GA) and f uzzy l ogic (FL) is designed. This mechanism incorporates the features and attention weights into chromosome encoding, fitness function formulation, and genetic operations, thereby enabling dynamic optimization of fuzzy rules and membership functions. Finally, an intelligent optimization framework that integrates perception, optimization, and decision-making is constructed, achieving closed-loop optimization from data to decision-making through a bidirectional flow mechanism and supporting continuous learning and self-adjustment of the system in dynamic market environments. R esults on financial datasets from Compustat and CRSP illustrate that the proposed method surpasses comparative models in financial optimization. Ablation experiments further validate the contributions of the Transformer-based feature extraction, genetic algorithm optimization, and fuzzy reasoning mechanism to the system's performance. This study provides a crucial theoretical foundation for enterprises to construct intelligent financial decision-making systems.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].