Western Amazon Basin limits: Conservation status and distribution of river dolphins (Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis) in Ecuador


Abstract

River dolphins (Inia geoffrensis and Sotalia fluviatilis) are apex predators in Ecuador's Amazon, where they face critical endangerment due to their restricted western range limit and escalating anthropogenic pressures. Despite their critical contributions to freshwater ecosystem health, comprehensive population assessments have historically been scarce. Using standardized protocols from the South American River Dolphin Initiative (SARDI), we conducted boat-based surveys spanning 972.6 km across 11 rivers, employing dual-platform distance sampling with habitat stratification. We analyzed 1,141 georeferenced records from Ecuador's National Biodiversity Database, validated through spatial modeling. Density and abundance were estimated using Distance software with satellite-derived habitat areas. Both species exhibit critically low densities (Inia: 0.03–6.53 ind./km²; Sotalia: 0.04–1.13 ind./km²), confirming national critically endangered status. We document population declines in key protected areas while updating known species distributions, confirming Inia in 37 rivers and recording Sotalia in 13 rivers, establishing Ecuador as their westernmost Amazonian range limit. Group sizes varied significantly by habitat, with confluences supporting larger aggregations. This first nationwide assessment reveals acute vulnerability of Ecuador's river dolphins at their distributional edge. Urgent implementation of Ecuador’s Action Plan for river dolphin conservation is needed, prioritizing rivers and confluences with confirmed occurrences, transboundary coordination, and community-based monitoring to prevent local extirpations.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].