Bidirectional Mamba and routing-attention synergistic network for efficient medical image segmentation


Abstract

Based on U-shaped architecture for medical image segmentation faces three fundamental challenges limiting clinical deployment: (1) architectural homogeneity problems where uniform mechanism deployment overlooks distinct encoder-decoder requirements, (2) skip connection feature fusion limitations with insufficient spatial-channel attention integration, (3) computational efficiency versus performance trade-offs. We propose a heterogeneous U-shaped architecture that strategically deploys specialized mechanisms based on component-specific functional requirements. Our approach utilizes Vision Mamba with Non-causal State Space Duality (VSSD) in encoder/bottleneck for efficient global context extraction, Bi-Level Routing Attention (BRA) in decoder for adaptive detail recovery, and introduces Spatial-Channel Synergistic Attention (SCSA) in skip connections to optimize multi-scale feature integration with only 0.1M additional parameters. Extensive experiments across four diverse datasets demonstrate exceptional performance: for example on Synapse dataset, our model achieves 84% Dice Similarity Coefficient and 13.76mm Hausdorff Distance with only 23.43M parameters. Details are available on \href{https://github.com/Yuyan-Bin/Synergistic-Networka}{Github}.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].