Holocene vegetation change and fire history in a sub-alpine Hawaiian dryland


Abstract

Over the last millennium, since human arrival, Hawaiian dryland ecosystems have been increasingly degraded and fragmented through habitat loss, invasive species, resource exploitation, and fire. Conventional interpretations hold that fire was rare or absent in these systems prior to human settlement. To evaluate this assumption, we reconstructed the disturbance and vegetation history of Kipuka Kalawamauna, a 14,000-year-old substrate on the leeward flank of Mauna Loa (<1,000 mm annual precipitation), where vegetation today is dominated by the native grass Eragrostis atropioidesand the native shrub Dodonaea viscosa. Using LiDAR-derived topographic mapping, we identified a stable soil accumulation zone and excavated a 1.55 m sediment profile. Stratigraphy and radiocarbon dating of microcharcoal and macroscopic charcoal fragments revealed a continuous fire record spanning <200 to 13,480 calibrated years before present (cal yr BP). Charcoal was present in every horizon, demonstrating that fire has occurred in this landscape for more than 13 millennia, albeit at low frequency prior to human arrival. Taxonomic identifications from plant microfossils, including preserved macroscopic charcoal fragments (>250 μm), indicated the past presence of native woody taxa no longer found in Kipuka Kalawamauna, such as Acacia, Cordia, Nothocestrum, Osteomeles, and Leptecophylla. D. viscosa, now abundant, was absent from the identifiable prehistoric assemblage. These identifications, together with the stratigraphic context, demonstrate that the plant community occupying this site in the past was compositionally different from the one present today. Stable carbon isotope (δ¹³C) analyses of soil organic matter indicated varying relative contributions of C ₃ and C ₄ plants throughout the Holocene, with elevated C ₄ inputs in mid-Holocene horizons. Grass cuticle counts confirmed a persistent presence of grasses over the last several thousand years, with higher abundances in more recent horizons. The combined charcoal and plant microfossil evidence documents a long-term history of fire in this subalpine dryland and shows that its vegetation composition has changed considerably over the late Quaternary. While the profile shows an increase in charcoal abundance in the upper horizons consistent with human-era burning, fires were already a persistent—though infrequent—component of the system for thousands of years before human arrival. These results provide a rare, stratified record of fire and vegetation change from a Hawaiian dryland and offer a critical baseline for interpreting contemporary species distributions, understanding the role of disturbance in shaping dryland plant communities, and informing management strategies aimed at conserving and restoring these increasingly rare ecosystems.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].