Increased risk of venous thromboembolism in children and teenagers with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis


Abstract

Background. The increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is well known, but we know less about the VTE risk of IBD in children and teenagers. We evaluated the risk of VTE in children and teenagers through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies from the establishment of these databases to June 30, 2025, to find relevant research on the risk of VTE in children and teenagers with IBD (PROSPERO, ID: CRD420251081653). Random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results. Five cohort studies were included in this systematic review, involving 84,869 children and teenagers with IBD and 7,534,656 non-IBD controls. Compared with non-IBD children and teenagers, the overall RR of VTE in children and teenagers with IBD was 5. 07 (95% CI 2.46 -1 0 . 47 , P<0.001). The risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in children and teenagers with IBD was increased (RR=6.25, 95% CI 1.13-34.69, P=0.036); the risk of pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) in children and teenagers with IBD was also increased, but there was no statistically significant difference (RR=3.13, 95% CI, 0.96-10.19, P=0.058). Children and teenagers with ulcerative colitis (UC) have a higher risk of VTE ( RR=7.46, 95% CI, 2.07-26.88, P=0.002 ) than those with Crohn's disease (CD) ( RR=4.98, 95% CI, 1.89-13.12, P=0.001) The unadjusted VTE risk in children and teenagers with IBD (RR=6.78, 95% CI 2 .97-25.49, P<0.001) was higher than the adjusted VTE risk for confounding factors (RR= 6 . 42, 95% CI 2 . 82 - 14 . 6, P<0.00 1 ).

Conclusions. The RR of VTE in children and teenagers with IBD is significantly increased. We should also attach importance to the occurrence and prevention of VTE in children and teenagers.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].