Enhancing stock price forecasting via multi-task learning framework incorporating transformer


Abstract

Stock price prediction is a critical task in financial decision-making, providing essential insights for investors, institutions, and policymakers. Despite significant progress, existing models face two primary limitations: (i) insufficient integration of trading volume as a dynamic component, and (ii) limited capacity of conventional deep learning architectures to capture long-range temporal dependencies. To address these challenges, we propose a novel prediction framework that combines a Transformer-based architecture with a multi-task learning strategy. The model leverages the Transformer’s self-attention mechanism to effectively model complex temporal dependencies in both stock price and trading volume sequences. By introducing trading volume prediction as an auxiliary task, the framework enables joint learning of the evolving dynamics between price and trading activity. This design enhances the model’s representational power and improves forecasting accuracy. Extensive experiments on real-world financial datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms strong baseline methods, validating its effectiveness in capturing complex dependencies and integrating multiple financial signals.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].