Design of an intelligent information assessment model based on multiscale convolutional neural networks within the realm of online education


Abstract

The utilization of a traditional Convolutional Neural Network, albeit with a single receptive field, leads to a diminished accuracy in image retrieval. Simultaneously, model training often suffers from overfitting when executed with a limited dataset. To address these challenges, this study introduces a multiscale-based Convolutional Neural Network for the creation of an intelligent information assessment model. A novel addition, the dilated Convolution, enhances the encoder by employing a four-layer dilated convolutional network to encode sample image features. It subsequently splices the deep features obtained from image extraction in both the training and test sets, facilitating multiscale feature group comparisons. Furthermore, the incorporation of a dense residual convolutional module, which incorporates dense connections, establishes multiple short-circuit connections between multilayer convolutional layers. This construct captures a wealth of contextual semantic information. To gauge the model's efficacy, experimental validation is conducted on two modest sample benchmark image datasets: Omniglot and Min-Imagenet. The results demonstrate an 86.6% accuracy rate, a 90.47% recall rate, an 88.71% precision rate, and an average reduction in model parameters and computational complexity of 12.3% and 33.12%, respectively. Additionally, the overall precision of the Overall Accuracy (OA) and the Kappa coefficient witnesses an average improvement of 81.95% and 0.804, respectively. These outcomes effectively affirm the algorithm's superiority in solving small-sample image classification problems. Following the analysis, it becomes evident that an effective intelligent information assessment model greatly facilitates the extraction and utilization of resources in the realm of online education, carrying significant practical implications for its development.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].