Back to all available

Genome-wide identification of SMALL AUXIN UP RNA (SAUR) gene family and its expression profiles in response to abiotic stress and auxin in tea plants (Camellia sinensis )

bioinformatics
genomics
plant-science

Abstract

The tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) is particularly vulnerable to abiotic stresses, with impacts on its growth and the production of bioactive compounds. SMALL AUXIN UP RNA (SAUR) genes, the largest family of early auxin-responsive genes, regulate plant growth and abiotic stress responses. However, their roles in the tea plant remain unknown. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of CsSAURs, including phylogenetic relationships, gene structure, chromosomal distribution, duplication events, motif composition, cis-elements, and gene ontology (GO) annotations. Expression profiles were examined using transcriptome data and validated by qRT-PCR. 97 CsSAURs were identified and classified into 8 phylogenetic groups, with 90 mapped to 15 chromosomes and 7 to contigs. Genes within the same group exhibit conserved gene structures and motif compositions. Segmental duplication predominantly contributes to family expansion. The predominant CsSAUR expression was found in flowers, with their promoters containing auxin-responsive, phytohormone, and stress-related cis-elements. A limited number of CsSAURs exhibit responsiveness to cold, drought, salinity, and methyl jasmonate (MeJA). Notably, CsSAUR10, 16, and 73 exhibited significant upregulation under abiotic stress and auxin treatment. Overall, this study characterizes the SAUR family in the tea plant and highlights its potential roles in the regulation of growth and stress responses. The identified auxin and stress-responsive CsSAURs represent potential targets for genetic improvement of tea plants.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].