Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal biphasic thermal adaptation strategies in Lavandula angustifolia under high-temperature stress


Abstract

Background. Lavandula angustifolia is a commercially vital medicinal plant, but its molecular adaptation mechanisms under high-temperature stress (HTS) remain poorly understood. Global warming poses a significant threat to agricultural productivity, necessitating deeper insights into plant thermotolerance strategies to develop climate-resilient crops.

Methods. We employed integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses to investigate the biphasic responses of L. angustifolia to HTS. Seedlings were subjected to short-term (1–5 h) and long-term (3–5 days) heat stress at 38 ℃. Physiological parameters, including malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline (PRO) levels, were measured. Transcriptomic sequencing and metabolomic profiling were conducted to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs). Functional enrichment and pathway analyses were performed to elucidate key molecular mechanisms.

Results. Short-term responses featured rapid Ca² ⁺ -mediated signaling, heat-shock protein activation, and transient oxidative stress, accompanied by osmoprotectant accumulation (e.g., proline and raffinose-family oligosaccharides). Long-term adaptation involved systemic metabolic reorganization, including enhanced citrate cycle (TCA cycle) flux, glyoxylate metabolism, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Key regulators such as aconitate hydratase and galactinol synthase, along with signature metabolites like 2-oxoadipic acid and capric acid, were identified as markers of thermal adaptation. The study reveals a transition from immediate protective responses to sustained metabolic optimization, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding L. angustifolia’s thermotolerance. These findings offer actionable targets for breeding heat-resistant cultivars to mitigate climate change impacts on medicinal crop production.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].