Potential relationship of the gut microbiome with testosterone level in men: a systematic review


Abstract

The gut microbiome influences the metabolism and health of several organs beyond the gut and has recently gained considerable importance. The gut is central to food digestion, absorption, nutrition, and general health. Hence, the gut microbiome has become a subject of research in almost all health conditions. Imbalance or dysbiosis in the gut microbiome can cause different health issues in males, including reproductive and sexual health issues associated with testosterone levels. The relationship between the gut microbiome and testosterone levels has been investigated in several studies. In this systematic review, we aimed to investigate the relationship between gut microbiome and testosterone levels in males. Literature searches were conducted by scanning PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, Taylor & Francis Online, Wiley Online, Springer Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases for relevant keywords following the preferred reporting items for systematic review guidelines. This systematic investigation revealed a significant positive correlation between gut microbiome and testosterone levels in men. Several microbiomes were reported to have a significant role in testosterone. The mechanisms were proposed as factors that contribute to testosterone levels, namely, the hypothalamus-pituitary gonad axis, androgen metabolism, and intestinal homeostasis through balancing bone morphogenic protein (BMP) and Wnt diverse microbiome. Ruminococcus showed a stronger correlation with testosterone than with other microorganisms. The gut microbiome has complex correlations and mechanisms in testosterone metabolism. However, the microbiome with the most significant influence on testosterone levels could not be easily summarized and requires further research.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at peer.review@peerj.com.