Back to all available

Cooperative detoxification mechanisms of arsenate reduction and arsenic methylation in surface agricultural soil

genomics
microbiology
soil-science
environmental-contamination-and-remediation

Abstract

Microbial arsenic (As) transformations play a vital role in both driving the global arsenic biogeochemical cycle and determining the mobility and toxicity of arsenic in soils. Due to the complexity of soils, variations in soil characteristics, and the presence and condition of overlying vegetation, soil microbiomes and their functional pathways vary from site to site. Consequently, key arsenic-transforming mechanisms in soil are not well characterized. This study utilized a combination of high-throughput amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics to identify arsenic-transforming pathways in surface agricultural soils. The temporal and successional variations of the soil microbiome and arsenic-transforming bacteria in agricultural soils were examined during tropical monsoonal dry and wet seasons, with a six-month interval. Soil microbiomes of both dry and wet seasons were relatively consistent, particularly the relative abundance of Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadota, and Bacteroidota. Common bacterial taxa present at high abundance, and potentially capable of arsenic transformations, were Bacillus, Streptomyces, and Microvirga. The resulting shotgun metagenome indicated that among the four key arsenic-functional genes, the arsC gene exhibited the highest relative abundance, followed by the arsM, aioA, and arrA genes, in declining sequence. Gene sequencing data based on 16S rRNA predicted only the arsC and aioA genes. Overall, this study proposed that a cooperative mechanism involving detoxification through arsenate reduction and arsenic methylation was a key arsenic transformation in surface agricultural soils with low arsenic concentration (7.60 to 10.28 mg/kg). This study significantly advances our knowledge of arsenic-transforming mechanisms interconnected with microbial communities in agricultural soil, enhancing pollution control measures, mitigating risks, and promoting sustainable soil management practices.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at peer.review@peerj.com.