Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a survey of current treatment practices of Saudi Arabia-based healthcare providers


Abstract

Abstract: Background: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a hip disorder that results in high pain, limited hip function, and lower quality of life. Adhering to the optimal clinical practices for diagnosing and treating children with DDH is crucial to ensure high-standard of care and minimizes the likelihood of late DDH diagnosis and complications. Several clinical practices are used across the world, but limited data are available regarding the current practice for DDH in Saudi Arabia. This study examined the current clinical practices used to screen and treat children with DDH in Saudi Arabia. Methods: An online survey was completed by healthcare providers directly managing DDH cases in Saudi Arabia. Collected data included demographic information, professional experience, and practices regarding screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Descriptive and frequency statistics characterized numerical and categorical data were computed. Results: Twenty-two healthcare providers participated in this study (average age=47 years; men=82%), with the majority of participants were working in the central region of Saudi Arabia (73%). The majority of our sample were orthopaedic surgeons (86%), work in tertiary healthcare settings (68%), and completed a specific DDH training programs (91%). Approximately 66% of participants reported having a standardized protocol at their institution screening and treating potential infants/newborns with DDH. Conservative treatment, primarily Pavlik harness, was the first-line treatment for DDH among children under 6 months of age (82%). A large proportion of the participants reported requesting follow-up visits within 1-2 months post first DDH treatment given (82%). Finally, orthopedic surgeons commonly measure and apply Pavlik harnesses for children diagnosed with DDH (86%), followed by physical therapists (9%). Conclusion: In Saudi Arabia, the current clinical practice of DDH screening and treatment used by healthcare providers aligns with the international DDH clinical guidelines in many aspects, specifically determining DDH risk factors and using imaging to aid the diagnosis process. Enhancing training and adherence to comprehensive screening protocols could improve the early detection and management of DDH in Saudi Arabia that would eventually lead to better patients’ outcomes and lower the rate of late DDH.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at peer.review@peerj.com.