Characterization of the HAK gene and its expression during in vitro germination and seedlings stage of two avocado varieties under salinity stress


Abstract

Soil salinity, a consequence of human and climatic activities, is one of the main challenges facing modern agriculture. Avocado is classified as glycophyte and is very sensitive to salt stress. There are avocado ecological varieties that show different salt tolerance levels. Intracellular potassium (K+) homeostasis is crucial for plant survival in saline environments. K+ channels and some members of the high-affinity K+ transporter HAK/KUP/KT (high-affinity K+) family are believed to function in the regulation of plant salt tolerance. Methods: In vitro seed germination, seedling growth in two ecological avocado varieties; americana and drymifolia were evaluated under different concentrations of NaCl. Physiomorphological variables were evaluated in two seedlings varieties. The concentration of sodium and potassium ions was evaluated by plasma-optical emission spectrometry. The characterization of the PaHAK2 gene was carried out by bioinformatic methods and its expression was evaluated by real-time quantitative PCR. Results: Salinity delay the germination speed of the drymifolia variety with respect to the americana variety. However, both varieties managed to germinate in vitro at 98-100% after 15 days. Salinity affected the physiomorphological variables evaluated in the seedlings after 30 days of growth in the different concentrations of NaCl. The RL/SL index showed significant differences between the two varieties. The K+/Na+ ratio decreased drastically and depended on the NaCl concentration in both varieties. The phylogenetic tree constructed with the sequence of the PaHAK2 gene and its plant orthologs showed 5 well-defined clusters. PaHAK2 gene from avocado is associated with sequences from basal angiosperms. These results helped us to make a computational 3D inference protein model. The most determining factor was the conserved transmembrane domains in the HAK families, observing that for PaHAK2, showed 10 conserved transmembrane domains. During seed germination, no increase in the expression of the PaHAK2 gene was detected and only a drastic increase in its expression was detected in drymifolia variety seedlings at a concentration of 60 mM NaCl. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the drymifolia variety is more sensitive to salinity than the americana variety. The seeds of both varieties can germinate under saline conditions. The americana variety has better physiomorphological variables that allow it to better tolerate salt stress. The PaHAK2 gene showed similarity to orthologs of eudicot plants even though avocado is a basal angiosperm, also presenting conserved domains of the HAK/KUP/KT ion transporters. The expression of the PaHAK2 gene suggests that it does not participate in the germination process in saline conditions of seeds of two avocado varieties and there is only an increase in its expression in the root and aerial part in seedlings of the drymifolia variety at the concentration of 60 mM.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at peer.review@peerj.com.