Variation of selected soil physico-chemical properties and their control by climate in tropical rainforests of Sri Lanka across a wide altitudinal gradient


Abstract

Background: Our objective in this work was to determine the variation of key physico-chemical properties of TRF soils across a wide altitudinal gradient in Sri Lanka. We aimed to identify the climate controls of TRF soil properties by relating their altitudinal variation to the climatic variation with altitude. Methods: We extracted nine soil variables, viz. pH, organic carbon (SOC), cation exchange capacity (CEC), percentages of sand, silt and clay, bulk density (BD), soil water contents at suctions of 0.033 MPa (Field Capacity, FC) and 1.5 MPa (Permanent Wilting Point, PWP), at five soil depths (0-5, 5-15, 15-30, 30-60 and 60-100 cm) from the national-level digital soil database for a series of permanent sampling plots in TRFs established from 117 to 2235 m above sea level. We quantified the contributions to the observed variance of each soil property from variations of altitude, soil depth and altitude × depth interaction, via a random effects general linear model analysis. We applied a factor analysis to extract key underlying composite soil variables and a subsequent multiple linear regression analysis to determine the influence of long-term climatic variables on the extracted composite soil variables. Results: The altitude effect contributed most (51% - 81%) to the variance of pH, percentages of sand, silt and clay, BD, FC, PWP and available soil water, ASW, calculated as the difference between FC and PWP. Soil depth effect was strongest on the variance of SOC and CEC. Field capacity, ASW, CEC and silt% showed significant linear increases with altitude whereas BD showed a significant linear decrease. Soil organic carbon and CEC showed significant linear decreases with soil depth. Bulk density showed significant negative correlations with SOC, CEC, FC and ASW. Cation exchange capacity showed significant positive correlations with SOC and silt%, but a significant negative correlation with sand%. Factor analysis extracted an underlying soil variable, Factor 1, incorporating CEC, Silt%, FC, ASW, PWP and BD, which explained 74% of the observed soil variation, plus another two, Factors 2 and 3, incorporating pH and clay% explaining 13% and 12% respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that Factor 1 decreased with increasing long-term (1970-2018) annual means of temperature and rainfall but increased with diurnal temperature range (DTR). Factor 3 increased with decreasing DTR and rainfall, but Factor 2 was climate-insensitive. Cluster analysis separated the TRFs at different altitudes to three clusters (i.e. up to 1100 m, 1100 – 1800 m and > 1800 m) at a maximum linkage distance of 1.0. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate the complex interactions between soil properties and climate in the TRF ecosystems in Sri Lanka. The relationships between the composite factors and long-term climate are important to predict how future climate change would influence key soil physico-chemical properties and thereby the TRFs in Sri Lanka.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at peer.review@peerj.com.