Metaheuristic optimized complex-valued Dilated Recurrent Neural Network for attack detection in Internet of Vehicular Communications


Abstract

The Internet of Vehicles (IoV) is a specialized iteration of the Internet of Things (IoT) tailored to facilitate communication and connectivity among vehicles and their environment. It harnesses the power of advanced technologies such as cloud computing, wireless communication and data analytics to allow for the seamless exchange of real-time data among vehicles, roadside infrastructure, traffic management systems and other entities. The primary objectives of this real-time data exchange include enhancing road safety, reducing traffic congestion, boosting traffic flow efficiency and enriching the driving experience. Through the IoV, vehicles can share information about traffic conditions, weather forecasts, road hazards, and other relevant data, fostering smarter, safer and more efficient transportation networks. Nonetheless, the development, implementation and maintenance of sophisticated techniques for detecting attacks present significant challenges and costs, which might limit their deployment, especially in smaller settings or those with constrained resources. To overcome these drawbacks, this paper outlines the development of an innovative attack detection model for the IoV using advanced deep learning techniques. The model aims to enhance security in vehicular networks by efficiently identifying attacks. Initially, data is collected from online databases and subjected to an optimal feature extraction process. During this phase, the Enhanced Exploitation in Hybrid Leader-based Optimization (EEHLO) method is employed to select the optimal features. These features are utilized by a Complex-Valued Dilated Recurrent Neural Network (CV-DRNN) to accurately detect attacks within vehicle networks. The performance of this novel attack detection model is rigorously evaluated and compared with that of traditional models using a variety of metrics.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at peer.review@peerj.com.