The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s

View preprint
RT @matthewcobb: Interested in #preprints in biology – and physics? This might shed some interesting light. @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/l…
reply repost on X like
Our first speaker is @matthewcobb discussing his preprint on the history of preprints in Biology: https://t.co/LkqJJhyCBG #UoMOpenResearch
reply repost on X like
3038 days ago
RT @uranus_2: 生物学ではpreprintsは1961年からNIHで実施されたことがあるが、出版社側がpreprintsを受け付けなかったので1967年までに終了したことがある。The prehistory of biology preprints https://…
reply repost on X like
生物学ではpreprintsは1961年からNIHで実施されたことがあるが、出版社側がpreprintsを受け付けなかったので1967年までに終了したことがある。The prehistory of biology preprints https://t.co/BofdRDrlS8
reply repost on X like
3039 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t…
reply repost on X like
RT @matthewcobb: Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t…
reply repost on X like
3040 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t…
reply repost on X like
RT @matthewcobb: Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t…
reply repost on X like
RT @matthewcobb: Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t…
reply repost on X like
3041 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t…
reply repost on X like
RT @matthewcobb: Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t…
reply repost on X like
3041 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t…
reply repost on X like
Submitted the revised version of my MS on the prehistory of preprints to @PLOSBiology. Better than the preprint: https://t.co/c8fOHqFiBa
reply repost on X like
3042 days ago
Great pre-print about the 50 year push for @biorxivpreprint pre-prints in biology by @matthewcobb https://t.co/MNJYpu3Ynn
reply repost on X like
3044 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: Interested in #preprints in biology – and physics? This might shed some interesting light. @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/l…
reply repost on X like
Fascinating account of a 1960s preprints experiment: https://t.co/qgKIE6431M HT Dick Wakeford. Nasty "Nature" editor probably John Maddox
reply repost on X like
3054 days ago
RT @AileenFyfe: Biologists tried preprints back in 1960s: https://t.co/2uv6UCG6ZB https://t.co/bPCzPVoWiE
reply repost on X like
3056 days ago
RT @PeerJPreprints: The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s https://t.co/AmuI44C2te #PeerRevWk17
reply repost on X like
RT @PeerJPreprints: The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s https://t.co/AmuI44C2te #PeerRevWk17
reply repost on X like
3059 days ago
RT @PeerJPreprints: The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s https://t.co/AmuI44C2te #PeerRevWk17
reply repost on X like
The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s https://t.co/AmuI44C2te #PeerRevWk17
reply repost on X like
3059 days ago
RT @AileenFyfe: Biologists tried preprints back in 1960s: https://t.co/2uv6UCG6ZB https://t.co/bPCzPVoWiE
reply repost on X like
RT @AileenFyfe: Biologists tried preprints back in 1960s: https://t.co/2uv6UCG6ZB https://t.co/bPCzPVoWiE
reply repost on X like
RT @AileenFyfe: Biologists tried preprints back in 1960s: https://t.co/2uv6UCG6ZB https://t.co/bPCzPVoWiE
reply repost on X like
3059 days ago
Biologists tried preprints back in 1960s: https://t.co/2uv6UCG6ZB https://t.co/bPCzPVoWiE
reply repost on X like