The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s

3071 days ago
RT @Alexis_Verger: The 1st large-scale adoption of biological preprints occured 30y before arXiv, a fascinating reading by @matthewcobb htt…
RT @Alexis_Verger: The 1st large-scale adoption of biological preprints occured 30y before arXiv, a fascinating reading by @matthewcobb htt…
The 1st large-scale adoption of biological preprints occured 30y before arXiv, a fascinating reading by @matthewcobb https://t.co/LCOCKfoifT
RT @RickyPo: 1966: Publishers respond to (and effectively kill) the first preprint services. https://t.co/VMqFZ4iKkN https://t.co/wx4d0ins…
3071 days ago
1966: Publishers respond to (and effectively kill) the first preprint services. https://t.co/VMqFZ4iKkN https://t.co/wx4d0ins9o
3071 days ago
RT @oatp: The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/knj4ghlDxP
RT @oatp: The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/knj4ghlDxP
The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/knj4ghlDxP
RT @matthewcobb: Interested in #preprints in biology – and physics? This might shed some interesting light. @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/l…
3072 days ago
RT @RickyPo: The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s https://t.co/VMqFZ4iKkN via @lgatt0 @ppgardne @matt…
RT @matthewcobb: Interested in #preprints in biology – and physics? This might shed some interesting light. @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/l…
RT @matthewcobb: How publishers (incl @nature) and vested interests killed preprint circulation in biology and physics in the 1960s: https:…
3072 days ago
The Prehistory of Biology Preprints https://t.co/IhWycQNJOz
3072 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: @Mhao6_ @PLOSBiology @Stephen_Curry @pollyp1 Just submitted, but available as a preprint! https://t.co/lfj4IIdUe7
3072 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: Interested in #preprints in biology – and physics? This might shed some interesting light. @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/l…
RT @matthewcobb: How publishers (incl @nature) and vested interests killed preprint circulation in biology and physics in the 1960s: https:…
3072 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: How publishers (incl @nature) and vested interests killed preprint circulation in biology and physics in the 1960s: https:…
3072 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: How publishers (incl @nature) and vested interests killed preprint circulation in biology and physics in the 1960s: https:…
RT @matthewcobb: Interested in #preprints in biology – and physics? This might shed some interesting light. @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/l…
3072 days ago
RT @matthewcobb: Interested in #preprints in biology – and physics? This might shed some interesting light. @biorxivpreprint https://t.co/l…
3072 days ago
Interesting piece on the history of preprints in biology. https://t.co/0JApcZENmj via @PeerJPreprints
Fascinating story on the (pre-)history of preprints, ironically posted as a preprint https://t.co/r29cnDvtDt
mt @SeqComplete : The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment f… https://t.co/U3Q7qDTw7x, see more https://t.co/D9GipwS8tX
RT @matthewcobb: How publishers (incl @nature) and vested interests killed preprint circulation in biology and physics in the 1960s: https:…
Prehistory of biology preprints https://t.co/RXcymGvtHC via @PeerJPreprints authored by @matthewcobb