Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature

Sci-Hub's coverage by subject area https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/iXkirT4hsV
Sci-Hub's coverage by country of publication https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/JrNXqOwTNX
The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with Crossref and - 85.1% of articles published in closed access journals https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/dv1hhtbnZ0
RT @opazolab: Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature https://t.co/y0hLJgS6qc via @PeerJPreprints
Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature https://t.co/y0hLJgS6qc via @PeerJPreprints
While CA/COCA membership pays for open access to the journal Chiropractic and Manual Therapies, other journals remain behind a paywall. A popular website has made much of that freely available to the scientific community. How popular SciHub? https://t.co/ssya1sQpg2
RT @jrossibarra: .@Sci_Hub now has >85% of all paywalled lit. Sweet analysis: https://t.co/x6PMVHxE6g
76 days ago
RT @jrossibarra: .@Sci_Hub now has >85% of all paywalled lit. Sweet analysis: https://t.co/x6PMVHxE6g
RT @jrossibarra: .@Sci_Hub now has >85% of all paywalled lit. Sweet analysis: https://t.co/x6PMVHxE6g
RT @jrossibarra: .@Sci_Hub now has >85% of all paywalled lit. Sweet analysis: https://t.co/x6PMVHxE6g
.@Sci_Hub now has >85% of all paywalled lit. Sweet analysis: https://t.co/x6PMVHxE6g
RT @Protohedgehog: "Here we report that, as of March 2017, Sci-Hub’s database contains 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registe…
RT @Protohedgehog: "Here we report that, as of March 2017, Sci-Hub’s database contains 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registe…
RT @olea: «For the first time, nearly all scholarly literature is available gratis to anyone with an Internet connection, suggesting the to…
RT @dhimmel: Version 3 of the @Sci_Hub Coverage Study #preprint released via @PeerJPreprints. Find out how Sci-Hub's coverage compares to o…
RT @dhimmel: Version 3 of the @Sci_Hub Coverage Study #preprint released via @PeerJPreprints. Find out how Sci-Hub's coverage compares to o…
RT @dhimmel: Version 3 of the @Sci_Hub Coverage Study #preprint released via @PeerJPreprints. Find out how Sci-Hub's coverage compares to o…
80 days ago
RT @dhimmel: Version 3 of the @Sci_Hub Coverage Study #preprint released via @PeerJPreprints. Find out how Sci-Hub's coverage compares to o…
RT @dhimmel: Version 3 of the @Sci_Hub Coverage Study #preprint released via @PeerJPreprints. Find out how Sci-Hub's coverage compares to o…
RT @dhimmel: Version 3 of the @Sci_Hub Coverage Study #preprint released via @PeerJPreprints. Find out how Sci-Hub's coverage compares to o…
RT @Protohedgehog: "Here we report that, as of March 2017, Sci-Hub’s database contains 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registe…
RT @Protohedgehog: "Here we report that, as of March 2017, Sci-Hub’s database contains 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registe…
"Here we report that, as of March 2017, Sci-Hub’s database contains 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with Crossref and 85.2% of articles published in toll access journals." https://t.co/kSPKYaa6Zq HT @dhimmel @Sci_Hub
80 days ago
«For the first time, nearly all scholarly literature is available gratis to anyone with an Internet connection, suggesting the toll access business model will become unsustainable.» https://t.co/tEITDLUdhM ❤️❤️ @Sci_Hub ❤️❤️
RT @dhimmel: Version 3 of the @Sci_Hub Coverage Study #preprint released via @PeerJPreprints. Find out how Sci-Hub's coverage compares to o…