Visitors   Views   Downloads

Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature

View preprint
RT @GScholarDigest: Sci-Hub's coverage by publication type https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/FNUBHra2ga
RT @GScholarDigest: Sci-Hub’s coverage by open oaDOI access status https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/fU8zahrGG3
9 days ago
Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature https://t.co/HHo8lZspI8
RT @Sci_Hub: those are comments on the study 'Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature' published on PeerJ https://t.co/p…
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @GScholarDigest: Sci-Hub's coverage by subject area https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/iXkirT4hsV
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @tiscar. El volumen de artículos científicos en @Sci_Hub por país, temática y editorial. “El agujero negro del #opendata. El 85,1% de artículos está publicado en revistas de acceso cerrado”. https://t.co/5v36alPaiy https://t.co/IFtG4FJvD3
RT @GScholarDigest: Sci-Hub’s coverage by open oaDOI access status https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/fU8zahrGG3
Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature. The website Sci-Hub enables users to download PDF versions of scholarly articles, including many articles that are paywalled at their journal’s site. https://t.co/ALT0dDOoD2 vía @PeerJPreprints
53 days ago
RT @GScholarDigest: Sci-Hub’s coverage by open oaDOI access status https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/fU8zahrGG3
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
54 days ago
RT @GScholarDigest: Sci-Hub’s coverage by open oaDOI access status https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/fU8zahrGG3
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
54 days ago
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
RT @GScholarDigest: Sci-Hub’s coverage by open oaDOI access status https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/fU8zahrGG3
RT @GScholarDigest: Sci-Hub's coverage by publication type https://t.co/d21mgdScqZ https://t.co/FNUBHra2ga
RT @GScholarDigest: The black hole of the open access: Sci-Hub’s contains - 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with C…
Wow. ..Sci-Hub’s database contains 68.9% of the 81.6 million scholarly articles registered with Crossref and 85.2% of articles published in toll access journals. https://t.co/Ifeyw2F1qK
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to report. Ariel Rodriguez Romero is an employee of Bidwise, Inc.

Author Contributions

Daniel S Himmelstein conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ariel R Romero performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jacob G Levernier conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Thomas A Munro performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Stephen R McLaughlin conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Bastian Greshake Tzovaras conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Casey S Greene conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Funding

DSH and CSG were funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's Data-Driven Discovery Initiative through Grant GBMF 4552 to CSG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Feedback on other revisions


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies